Skip navigation links Sitemap | About us | FAQs

UN Programme on Disability   Working for full participation and equality

 

Article 1- Purpose

Background Documents | Article 1 Background

Seventh Session | Fourth Session | Third Session
Working Group | References

Fourth Session

 

Comments, proposals and amendments submitted electronically


 

Governments

Chile
European Union
Mexico

 

National Human Rights Institutions                                                                

Meeting convened by the Office of the Swedish Disability Ombudsman

 

Non-governmental organizations                                                                 

International Disability Caucus
Landmines Survivors Network
People with Disability Australia

Working meeting of NGOs for People with Disabilities from Ukraine, Russia, Belarus & Moldova

 


 

Comments, proposals and amendments submitted electronically

 

Governments

CHILE

ARTICLE 1 – PURPOSE:

This article should state the two structural aims of the Convention, namely to promote and protect rights and to combat discrimination. We therefore propose the following language, using simple terms and avoiding any elements which will be stated in the rest of the text:

“The purpose of the present Convention shall be to promote and protect the full enjoyment by persons with disabilities of their human rights and fundamental freedoms, and to prevent any form of discrimination”.

Back to top

 

EUROPEAN UNION

Draft Article 1 – PURPOSE:

The purpose of this Convention shall be to ensure the full, effective and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by persons with disabilities.

EU proposal: “The purpose of the Convention shall be to ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by persons with disabilities.”

Back to top

 

MEXICO

Draft Article 1 – PURPOSE:

The purpose of the present convention is to promote the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms and the dignity of persons with disabilities.

Back to top

 

 

National Human Rights Institutions

 

MEETING CONVENED BY THE OFFICE OF THE SWEDISH DISABILITY OMBUDSMAN

Observations Regarding Draft Article 1 on Purpose

1. The participants propose that the wording of Draft Article 1 not be subjected to any of the proposed amendments.
Back to top

 

 

Non-governmental organizations

 

INTERNATIONAL DISABILITY CAUCUS

The purpose of this Convention shall be to [ensure, protect and promote] (promote, protect and fulfill) the full, effective and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities.

Back to top

 

LANDMINES SURVIVORS NETWORK

Draft Article 2 - GENERAL PRINCIPLES

SYNTHESIS OF PROPOSALS

The purpose of this Convention shall be to respect and ensure the full, effective and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by persons with disabilities.

COMMENTS
Inclusion of an article explicitly articulating the purpose of the treaty ensures that there is no ambiguity as to the objectives of the Convention and what, in essence, States Parties have undertaken to achieve. Even where the purpose of the Convention is implied in a preamble, it is not (as suggested by Japan) redundant to include an article such as this, for unlike the preamble this article is housed in the operative/legally binding section of the Convention. Indeed, prevailing international law practice in treaty drafting is to more explicitly articulate treaty objectives in a separate article, and so the inclusion of Draft Article 1 is in keeping with that practice. (Cf. Framework Convention on Climate Change, Article 2)

The draft language proposed here retains the formulation of the Working Group Draft Text (as supported by Russian Federation, EU and Jordan) with the addition of the word “respect,” as opposed to the formulation in FN 8 of the Working Group Draft Text (supported in large part by Argentina, South Africa, Mexico, China, Japan, El Salvador, Thailand, Mali, Eritrea, Uganda). FN 8 calls for the use of “protect and promote,” rather than “respect and ensure.” The obligation to “respect” has been interpreted as the duty of States to “refrain from restricting the exercise of these rights where such is not expressly allowed.” (Cf. “UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary,” Manfred Nowak, p. 36) The obligation to “ensure” has been interpreted as “a positive duty … [meaning that] States Parties are obligated to take positive steps to give effect to the rights.” (Cf. “UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary,” Manfred Nowak, p. 36-37) Thus, “respect and ensure” requires States not to violate or restrict the rights, as well as take positive steps to give effect to the rights. An examination of the seven core human rights instruments reveals that “respect and ensure” is the term utilized with regard to state obligations as opposed to “protect and promote,” and it is thus appropriate that Draft Article 1 retain consistency with such precedent.

The word “effective” has also been retained from the Working Group Draft Text (contrary to the suggestion of the EU). As articulated (by the Asia Pacific Forum) during the third Ad Hoc Committee meeting, the use of the term “effective” further reinforces the need for creation of conditions for actual enjoyment of human rights, rather than mere recognition of those rights.

Several proposals (India, Morocco and Sierra Leone) called for the inclusion of references to combating discrimination as a purpose or means of achieving the purposes of the Convention. Such references would be appropriate in the context of a non-discrimination Convention (such as the CEDAW, or CERD), but should not be included here. Although fighting discrimination against people with disabilities is a necessary and intrinsic component of this Convention, the scope of this Convention is broad and comprehensive, and such references to discrimination in the purpose could misleadingly imply that the Convention is limited in scope to a non-discrimination framework.

Back to top

 

PEOPLE WITH DISABILITY AUSTRALIA

We strongly support the Expert Working Group’s formulation of this article. However, we urge the incorporation of the additional concept of ‘dignity’ into the article. Rights and dignity are independent concepts, and recognition of rights alone will not necessarily ensure persons with disability will be treated with dignity. Apart from its potential mention in the title of the convention, the concept of dignity will not otherwise appear in this convention, unless it is included in this article or under Article 2: General Principles.

The article might therefore read:

The purpose of this Convention shall be to ensure the dignity and the full, effective and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by persons with disability
Back to top

 

 

WORKING MEETING OF NGOs FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES FROM UKRAINE, RUSSIA, BELARUS & MOLDOVA

After: The purpose of this Convention shall be to ensure” to add: by States Parties guarantees and opportunities for equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by persons with disabilities.

Back to top

 

 

 


Home | Sitemap | About us | News | FAQs | Contact us

© United Nations, 2006
Department of Economic and Social Affairs
Division for Social Policy and Development